Evidence for tactile 3D shape discrimination by octopus

Al-Soudy AS, Maselli V, Galdiero S, Kuba MJ, Polese G, CosmoA Di (2021) Identification and characterization of a rhodopsin kinase gene in the suckers of Octopus vulgaris: looking around using arms? Biology 10:936. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10090936

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Altman JS (1971) Control of accept and reject reflexes in the octopus. Nature 229:204–206. https://doi.org/10.1038/229204a0

Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ambrose RF, Nelson BV (1983) Predation by Octopus vulgaris in the Mediterranean. Mar Ecol 4:251–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0485.1983.tb00299.x

Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Borrelli L, Gherardi F, Fiorito G (2006) A catalog of body patterning in Cephalopoda. Firenze University Press, Firenze

Book  Google Scholar 

Boycott BB, Young JZ (1956) The subpedunculate body and nerve and other organs associated with the optic tract of cephalopods. Bertil Hanström. Zoological papers in honour of his sixty-fifth birthday. Zoological Institute, Lund, pp 76–105

Google Scholar 

Boyle PR (1986) Responses to water-borne chemicals by the octopus Eledone cirrhosa (Lamarck, 1798). J Exp Mar Bio Ecol 104:23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(86)90095-X

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Buresch KC, Sklar K, Chen JY, Madden SR, Mongil AS, Wise GV, Boal JG, Hanlon RT (2022) Contact chemoreception in multi-modal sensing of prey by Octopus. J Comp Physiol A 208:435–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-022-01549-y

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Byrne RA, Kuba MJ, Meisel DV, Griebel U, Mather JA (2006) Octopus arm choice is strongly influenced by eye use. Behav Brain Res 172:195–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2006.04.026

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Forsythe JW, Hanlon RT (1988) Effect of temperature on laboratory growth, reproduction and life span of Octopus bimaculoides. Mar Biol 98:369–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00391113

Article  Google Scholar 

Forsythe JW, Hanlon RT (1997) Foraging and associated behavior by Octopus cyanea Gray, 1849 on a coral atoll, French Polynesia. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 209:15–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(96)00057-3

Article  Google Scholar 

Grasso FW (2008) Octopus sucker-arm coordination in grasping and manipulation. Am Malacol Bull 24:13–23. https://doi.org/10.4003/0740-2783-24.1.13

Article  Google Scholar 

Graziadei P (1962) Receptors in suckers of Octopus. Nature 195:57–59. https://doi.org/10.1038/195057a0

Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Graziadei P (1964) Electron microscopy of some primary receptors in the sucker of Octopus vulgaris. Z Für Zellforsch Mik Ana 64:510–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF010

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Graziadei PP, Gagne HT (1976) Sensory innervation in the rim of the octopus sucker. J Morphol 150:639–679. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.1051500304

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gutnick T, Byrne RA, Hochner B, Kuba M (2011) Octopus vulgaris uses visual information to determine the location of its arm. Curr Biol 21:460–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.01.052

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gutnick T, Zullo L, Hochner B, Kuba MJ (2020) Use of peripheral sensory information for central nervous control of arm movement by Octopus vulgaris. Curr Biol 30:4322–4327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.08.037

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hanassy S, Botvinnik A, Flash T, Hochner B (2015) Stereotypical reaching movements of the octopus invlove both bend propagation and arm elongation. Bioinspir Biomim 10:035001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/10/3/0350001

Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hanlon RT, Messenger JB (2018) Cephalopod behaviour, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Book  Google Scholar 

Holst MM, Hauver CM, Stein RS, Milano BL, Levine LH, Zink AG, Watters JV, Crook RJ (2022) Behavioral changes in senescent giant Pacific octopus (Enteroctopus dofleini) are associated with peripheral neural degeneration and loss of epithelial tissue. Comp Biochem Physiol A 271:111263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2022.111263

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Ifere NO, Shidara H, Sato N, Ogawa H (2022) Spatial perception mediated by insect antenna mechanosensory system. J Exp Biol 225:jeb24376. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.243276

Article  Google Scholar 

Kawashima S, Ikeda Y (2021) Evaluation of visual and tactile perception by plain-body Octopus (Callistoctopus aspilosomatis) of prey-like objects. Zool Sci 38:495–505. https://doi.org/10.2108/zs210037

Article  Google Scholar 

Kawashima S, Yasumuro H, Ikeda Y (2021) Plain-body Octopus’s (Callistoctopus aspilosomatis) learning about objects via both visual and tactile sensory inputs: a pilot study. Zool Sci 38:383–396. https://doi.org/10.2108/zs210034

Article  Google Scholar 

Kuba M, Byrne RA, Meisel DV, Mather JA (2006a) Exploration and habituation in intact free moving Octopus vulgaris. Int J Comp Psychol 19:426–438. https://doi.org/10.46867/ijcp.2006.19.04.02

Article  Google Scholar 

Kuba MJ, Byrne RA, Meisel DV, Mather JA (2006b) When do octopuses play? Effects or repeated testing, object type, age, and food depravation on object play in Octopus vulgaris. J Comp Psychol 120:184–190. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.120.3.184

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lee PG (1992) Chemotaxis by Octopus maya Voss et Solis in a Y-maze. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 153:53–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(92)90016-4

Article  Google Scholar 

Leite TS, Haimovici M, Mather J (2009) Octopus insularis (Octopodidae), evidences of a specialized predator and a time-minimizing hunter. Mar Biol 156:2355–2367. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00227-009-1264-4

Article  Google Scholar 

Maselli V, Al-Soudy AS, Buglione M, Aria M, Polese G, Di Cosmo A (2020) Sensorial hierarchy in Octopus vulgaris’s food choice: chemical vs. visual. Animals 10:457. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10030457

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mather JA, Anderson RC (1999) Exploration, play and habituation in octopuses (Octopus dofleini). J Comp Psychol 113:333–338. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.113.3.333

Article  Google Scholar 

Mather JA, O’Dor RK (1991) Foraging strategies and predation risk shape the natural history of juvenile Octopus vulgaris. Bull Mar Sci 49:256–269

Google Scholar 

Mellon D (2012) Smelling, feeling, tasting and touching: behavioral and neural integration of antennular chemosensory and mechanosensory inputs in the crayfish. J Exp Biol 215:2163–2172. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.069492

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Messenger JB, Wilson AP, Hedge A (1973) Some evidence for colour-blindness in Octopus. J Exp Biol 59:77–94. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.59.1.77

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Prescott TJ, Diamond ME, Wing AM (2011) Active touch sensing. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 366:2989–2995. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0167

Article  Google Scholar 

Robertson JD, Bonaventura J, Kohm A (1995) Nitric-oxide synthase inhibition blocks octopus touch learning without producing sensory or motor dysfunction. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 261:167–172. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1995.0132

Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Rowell CHF (1966) Activity of interneurones in arm of octopus in response to tactile stimulation. J Exp Biol 44:589–605. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.44.3.589

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Strobel SM, Sills JM, Tinker MT, Reichmuth CJ (2018) Active touch in sea otters: in-air and underwater texture discrimination thresholds and behavioral strategies for paws and vibrissae. J Exp Biol 221:jeb181347. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.181347

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sumbre G, Gutfreund Y, Fiorito G, Flash T, Hochner B (2001) Control of octopus arm extension by a peripheral motor program. Science 293:1845–1848. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1060976

Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sutherland NS (1962) Visual dsicrimination of shape by Octopus: squares and crosses. J Comp Physiol Psychol 55:939–943. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040049

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sutherland NS (1963) Shape discrimination and receptive fields. Nature 197:118–122. https://doi.org/10.1038/197118a0

Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Ten Cate J (1928) L’innervation des ventouses chez Octopus vulgaris. Arch Néerl Physiol 13:407–422

Google Scholar 

van Giesen L, Kilian PB, Allard CAH, Bellono NW (2020) Molecular basis of chemotactile sensation in Octopus. Cell 183:594–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.008

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Walderon MD, Nolt KJ, Haas RE, Prosser KN, Holm JB, Nagle GT, Boal JG (2011) Distance chemoreception and the detection of conspecifics in Octopus bimaculoides. J Molluscan Stud 77:309–311. https://doi.org/10.1093/mollus/eyr009

Article 

Comments (0)

No login
gif